↓ Skip to main content

Characteristics of Donor-Specific Antibodies Associated With Antibody-Mediated Rejection in Lung Transplantation

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Medicine, October 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
31 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
33 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Characteristics of Donor-Specific Antibodies Associated With Antibody-Mediated Rejection in Lung Transplantation
Published in
Frontiers in Medicine, October 2017
DOI 10.3389/fmed.2017.00155
Pubmed ID
Authors

Antoine Roux, Ines Bendib Le Lan, Sonia Holifanjaniaina, Kimberly A. Thomas, Clément Picard, Dominique Grenet, Sandra De Miranda, Benoit Douvry, Laurence Beaumont-Azuar, Edouard Sage, Jérôme Devaquet, Elise Cuquemelle, Morgan Le Guen, Caroline Suberbielle, Chantal Gautreau, Marc Stern, Maura Rossetti, Abdul Monem Hamid, Francois Parquin

Abstract

Although donor-specific anti-human leukocyte antigen (HLA) antibodies (DSAs) are frequently found in recipients after lung transplantation (LT), the characteristics of DSA which influence antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) in LT are not fully defined. We retrospectively analyzed 206 consecutive LT patients of our center (2010-2013). DSAs were detected by using luminex single antigen beads assay and mean fluorescence intensity was assessed. Within the study population, 105 patients had positive DSA. Patients with and without AMR (AMR(Pos), n = 22, and AMR(Neg), n = 83, respectively) were compared. AMR(Pos) patients had significantly greater frequencies of anti-HLA DQ DSA (DQ DSA) than AMR(Neg) patients (95 vs 58%, respectively, p < 0.0001). Compared to AMR(Neg) patients, AMR(Pos) patients had higher DQ DSA sum MFI [7,332 (2,067-10,213) vs 681 (0-1,887), p < 0.0001]. DQ DSA when associated with AMR, had more frequent graft loss and chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD). These data suggest (i) that DSA characteristics clearly differ between AMR(Pos) and AMR(Neg) patients and (ii) the deleterious impact of DQ DSA on clinical outcome.

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 33 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 15%
Researcher 4 12%
Student > Bachelor 3 9%
Other 3 9%
Student > Postgraduate 3 9%
Other 6 18%
Unknown 9 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 13 39%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 6%
Unspecified 1 3%
Decision Sciences 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 12 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 October 2017.
All research outputs
#18,573,839
of 23,005,189 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Medicine
#3,995
of 5,775 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#248,713
of 324,711 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Medicine
#46
of 69 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,005,189 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,775 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.4. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 324,711 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 69 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.