↓ Skip to main content

Sugar or Fat?—Metabolic Requirements for Immunity to Viral Infections

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in immunology, October 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
397 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
38 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
105 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Sugar or Fat?—Metabolic Requirements for Immunity to Viral Infections
Published in
Frontiers in immunology, October 2017
DOI 10.3389/fimmu.2017.01311
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hesham M. Shehata, Andrew J. Murphy, Man kit Sam Lee, Clair M. Gardiner, Suzanne M. Crowe, Shomyseh Sanjabi, David K. Finlay, Clovis Steve Palmer

Abstract

The realization that an intricate link exists between the metabolic state of immune cells and the nature of the elicited immune responses has brought a dramatic evolution to the field of immunology. We will focus on how metabolic reprogramming through the use of glycolysis and fatty-acid oxidation (sugar or fat) regulates the capacity of immune cells to mount robust and effective immune responses. We will also discuss how fine-tuning sugar and fat metabolism may be exploited as a novel immunotherapeutic strategy to fight viral infections or improve vaccine efficacy.

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 397 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 105 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 105 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 22%
Researcher 20 19%
Student > Bachelor 12 11%
Student > Master 8 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 7%
Other 19 18%
Unknown 16 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Immunology and Microbiology 27 26%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 17 16%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 16 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 7%
Chemistry 3 3%
Other 13 12%
Unknown 22 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 227. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 May 2022.
All research outputs
#180,414
of 26,627,710 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in immunology
#194
of 33,429 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,570
of 339,987 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in immunology
#2
of 561 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,627,710 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 33,429 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 339,987 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 561 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.