↓ Skip to main content

Upper extremity open fractures in hospitalized road traffic accident patients: adult versus pediatric cases

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research, October 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
47 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Upper extremity open fractures in hospitalized road traffic accident patients: adult versus pediatric cases
Published in
Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research, October 2017
DOI 10.1186/s13018-017-0657-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Guy Rubin, Kobi Peleg, Adi Givon, Nimrod Rozen

Abstract

Fractures in pediatrics show epidemiological characteristics which are different from fractures in adults. The objective of this study was to examine the injury profiles of open upper extremity fractures (UEFs) in all modes of injury related to road traffic accidents (RTAs) in adult and pediatric hospitalized patients. Data on 103,465 RTA patients between 1997 and 2013 whose records were entered in a centralized country trauma database were reviewed. Data on open UEFs related to mode of injury (car, motorcycle, bicycle, and pedestrian) was compared between adult (18+ years) and pediatric (0-17 years) RTA patients. Of 103,465 RTA cases, 17,263 (16.7%) had UEFs. Of 73,087 adults, 13,237 (18.1%) included UEFs and of 30,378 pediatric cases, 4026 (13.2%) included UEFs (p < 0.0001). Of 17,263 cases with UEFs, we reviewed 22,132 fractures with 2, 743 (12.4%) open fractures. Adults had a greater risk for open fractures (2221, 13%) than the pediatric cases (522, 10.3%) (p < 0.0001). Overall, of a total of 22,132 UEFs, most of the fractures were in the radius (22.8%), humerus (20.3%), clavicle (17.5%), and ulna (15.4%). The adult pedestrian group had a significantly higher risk for open UEFs than the pediatric group (11 vs 8%, p = 0.0012). This study demonstrates the difference between adult and pediatric open fractures in hospitalized RTAs. We showed that adults had a greater risk for open UEFs compared to children, and the adult pedestrian group particularly had a significantly higher risk for open UEFs than the pediatric group.

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 47 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 47 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 5 11%
Other 4 9%
Researcher 4 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 9%
Student > Master 4 9%
Other 10 21%
Unknown 16 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 22 47%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 9%
Unspecified 1 2%
Psychology 1 2%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 2%
Other 2 4%
Unknown 16 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 October 2017.
All research outputs
#18,574,814
of 23,006,268 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research
#965
of 1,399 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#250,949
of 327,740 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research
#17
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,006,268 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,399 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 327,740 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.