Title |
The More, The Better: “Do the Right Thing” For Natural Killer Immunotherapy in Acute Myeloid Leukemia
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in immunology, October 2017
|
DOI | 10.3389/fimmu.2017.01330 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Sarah Parisi, Mariangela Lecciso, Darina Ocadlikova, Valentina Salvestrini, Marilena Ciciarello, Dorian Forte, Giulia Corradi, Michele Cavo, Antonio Curti |
Abstract |
Natural killer (NK) cells are circulating CD3(-) lymphocytes, which express CD56 or CD16 and an array of inhibitory receptors, called killer-immunoglobulin-like receptors (KIRs). Alloreactive KIR-ligand mismatched NK cells crucially mediate the innate immune response and have a well-recognized antitumor activity. Adoptive immunotherapy with alloreactive NK cells determined promising clinical results in terms of response in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients and several data demonstrated that response can be influenced by the composition of NK graft. Several data show that there is a correlation between NK alloreactivity and clinical outcome: in a cohort of AML patients who received NK infusion with active disease, more alloreactive NK cell clones were found in the donor repertoire of responders than in non-responders. These findings demonstrate that the frequency of alloreactive NK cell clones influence clinical response in AML patients undergoing NK cell immunotherapy. In this work, we will review the most recent preclinical and clinical data about the impact of alloreactive NK cells features other than frequency of alloreactive clones and cytokine network status on their anti-leukemic activity. A better knowledge of these aspects is critical to maximize the effects of this therapy in AML patients. |
X Demographics
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Ireland | 1 | 10% |
France | 1 | 10% |
Mexico | 1 | 10% |
Switzerland | 1 | 10% |
Unknown | 6 | 60% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 7 | 70% |
Scientists | 3 | 30% |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 38 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 29% |
Researcher | 8 | 21% |
Professor | 4 | 11% |
Student > Master | 3 | 8% |
Lecturer | 1 | 3% |
Other | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 10 | 26% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Immunology and Microbiology | 12 | 32% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 13% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 11% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 8% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 5% |
Other | 2 | 5% |
Unknown | 10 | 26% |