The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 184 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Enhancing the Clinical Potential of AAV Vectors by Capsid Engineering to Evade Pre-Existing Immunity
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Microbiology, January 2011
|
DOI | 10.3389/fmicb.2011.00204 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Melissa Bartel, David Schaffer, Hildegard Büning |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Germany | 2 | 1% |
United States | 2 | 1% |
Israel | 1 | <1% |
Spain | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 178 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 43 | 23% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 42 | 23% |
Student > Bachelor | 21 | 11% |
Student > Master | 19 | 10% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 4% |
Other | 20 | 11% |
Unknown | 31 | 17% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 52 | 28% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 43 | 23% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 11 | 6% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 10 | 5% |
Neuroscience | 9 | 5% |
Other | 23 | 13% |
Unknown | 36 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 February 2023.
All research outputs
#3,367,459
of 23,306,612 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Microbiology
#3,239
of 25,611 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,682
of 182,860 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Microbiology
#19
of 123 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,306,612 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 25,611 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 182,860 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 123 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.