The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Treatment of Class II malocclusion with bialveolar protrusion by means of unusual extractions and anchorage mini-implant
|
---|---|
Published in |
Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics, November 2012
|
DOI | 10.1590/s2176-94512012000500023 |
Authors |
Jong-Moon Chae |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Italy | 1 | 5% |
Egypt | 1 | 5% |
Unknown | 18 | 90% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 8 | 40% |
Other | 2 | 10% |
Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 10% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 10% |
Professor | 1 | 5% |
Other | 3 | 15% |
Unknown | 2 | 10% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 15 | 75% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 5% |
Unspecified | 1 | 5% |
Unknown | 3 | 15% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 July 2015.
All research outputs
#19,942,887
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics
#189
of 459 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#219,227
of 286,174 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics
#10
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 459 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 286,174 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.