↓ Skip to main content

Type I Interferons in the Pathogenesis of Tuberculosis: Molecular Drivers and Immunological Consequences

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in immunology, November 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (89th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
16 X users
patent
1 patent
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Readers on

mendeley
157 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Type I Interferons in the Pathogenesis of Tuberculosis: Molecular Drivers and Immunological Consequences
Published in
Frontiers in immunology, November 2017
DOI 10.3389/fimmu.2017.01633
Pubmed ID
Authors

Meg L. Donovan, Thomas E. Schultz, Taylor J. Duke, Antje Blumenthal

Abstract

Tuberculosis (TB) remains a major global health threat. Urgent needs in the fight against TB include improved and innovative treatment options for drug-sensitive and -resistant TB as well as reliable biological indicators that discriminate active from latent disease and enable monitoring of treatment success or failure. Prominent interferon (IFN) inducible gene signatures in TB patients and animal models of Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection have drawn significant attention to the roles of type I IFNs in the host response to mycobacterial infections. Here, we review recent developments in the understanding of the innate immune pathways that drive type I IFN responses in mycobacteria-infected host cells and the functional consequences for the host defense against M. tuberculosis, with a view that such insights might be exploited for the development of targeted host-directed immunotherapies and development of reliable biomarkers.

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 157 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 157 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 36 23%
Student > Master 15 10%
Researcher 14 9%
Student > Postgraduate 14 9%
Student > Bachelor 11 7%
Other 20 13%
Unknown 47 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Immunology and Microbiology 36 23%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 24 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 15 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14 9%
Computer Science 2 1%
Other 10 6%
Unknown 56 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 July 2020.
All research outputs
#2,897,874
of 26,411,386 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in immunology
#3,085
of 33,432 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#59,333
of 452,998 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in immunology
#63
of 592 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,411,386 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 33,432 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 452,998 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 592 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.