You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Cardiac Tumors: A Brief Commentary
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Public Health, December 2014
|
DOI | 10.3389/fpubh.2014.00264 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Leonardo Roever, Antonio Casella-Filho, Paulo Magno Martins Dourado, Elmiro Santos Resende, Antônio Carlos Palandri Chagas |
Abstract |
Patients with cardiac tumors may present with cardiovascular related or constitutional symptoms, but more often than not a cardiac mass is discovered incidentally during an imaging examination performed for an unrelated indication. Cardiac myxoma is generally considered to be a surgical emergency. Echocardiography, including the transesophageal approach, is the most important means of diagnosis; computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging. The clinical presentation has changed, and the management of cardiac myxoma now needs to be reviewed. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Switzerland | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Brazil | 1 | 5% |
Unknown | 19 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 5 | 25% |
Other | 2 | 10% |
Librarian | 2 | 10% |
Student > Bachelor | 2 | 10% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 10% |
Other | 3 | 15% |
Unknown | 4 | 20% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 11 | 55% |
Arts and Humanities | 1 | 5% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 5% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 5% |
Social Sciences | 1 | 5% |
Other | 1 | 5% |
Unknown | 4 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 December 2014.
All research outputs
#18,385,510
of 22,772,779 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Public Health
#5,629
of 9,792 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#260,680
of 359,774 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Public Health
#42
of 59 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,772,779 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,792 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.9. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 359,774 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 59 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.