↓ Skip to main content

Photoprotection of Buddleja cordata extract against UVB-induced skin damage in SKH-1 hairless mice

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies, August 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
62 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Photoprotection of Buddleja cordata extract against UVB-induced skin damage in SKH-1 hairless mice
Published in
BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies, August 2014
DOI 10.1186/1472-6882-14-281
Pubmed ID
Authors

José Guillermo Avila Acevedo, Adriana Montserrat Espinosa González, Diana Matamoros De Maria y Campos, José del Carmen Benitez Flores, Tzasna Hernández Delgado, Saul Flores Maya, Jorge Campos Contreras, José Luis Muñoz López, Ana María García Bores

Abstract

In recent years, there has been considerable interest in using botanical agents to prevent skin damage resulting from solar UV-irradiation. Buddleja cordata is a plant that is known as "tepozan". Some people in Mexico use the leaves of this plant to treat tumours, abscesses, sores and burns. The purpose of this study is to investigate the photoprotective properties of Buddleja cordata methanolic extract (BCME) against UVB-induced skin damage in SKH-1 hairless mice at the macroscopic and histological levels.

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 62 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 62 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 13%
Student > Bachelor 8 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 10%
Student > Master 6 10%
Researcher 5 8%
Other 12 19%
Unknown 17 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 10 16%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 15%
Chemistry 7 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 8%
Other 7 11%
Unknown 17 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 December 2014.
All research outputs
#15,312,760
of 22,774,233 outputs
Outputs from BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies
#2,036
of 3,623 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#132,953
of 229,822 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies
#57
of 101 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,774,233 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,623 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.5. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 229,822 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 101 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.