Title |
Evaluating the Surveillance System for Spotted Fever in Brazil Using Machine-Learning Techniques
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Public Health, November 2017
|
DOI | 10.3389/fpubh.2017.00323 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Diego Montenegro Lopez, Flávio Luis de Mello, Cristina Maria Giordano Dias, Paula Almeida, Milton Araújo, Monica Avelar Magalhães, Gilberto Salles Gazeta, Reginaldo Peçanha Brasil |
Abstract |
This work analyses the performance of the Brazilian spotted fever (SF) surveillance system in diagnosing and confirming suspected cases in the state of Rio de Janeiro (RJ), from 2007 to 2016 (July) using machine-learning techniques. Of the 890 cases reported to the Disease Notification Information System (SINAN), 11.7% were confirmed as SF, 2.9% as dengue, 1.6% as leptospirosis, and 0.7% as tick bite allergy, with the remainder being diagnosed as other categories (10.5%) or unspecified (72.7%). This study confirms the existence of obstacles in the diagnostic classification of suspected cases of SF by clinical signs and symptoms. Unlike man-capybara contact (1.7% of cases), man-tick contact (71.2%) represents an important risk indicator for SF. The analysis of decision trees highlights some clinical symptoms related to SF patient death or cure, such as: respiratory distress, convulsion, shock, petechiae, coma, icterus, and diarrhea. Moreover, cartographic techniques document patient transit between RJ and bordering states and within RJ itself. This work recommends some changes to SINAN that would provide a greater understanding of the dynamics of SF and serve as a model for other endemic areas in Brazil. |
X Demographics
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 54 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 9 | 17% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 13% |
Student > Bachelor | 5 | 9% |
Librarian | 3 | 6% |
Professor | 3 | 6% |
Other | 14 | 26% |
Unknown | 13 | 24% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 11 | 20% |
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 5 | 9% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 9% |
Mathematics | 3 | 6% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 3 | 6% |
Other | 12 | 22% |
Unknown | 15 | 28% |