Title |
Efficacy and Safety of Panax notoginseng Saponin Therapy for Acute Intracerebral Hemorrhage, Meta-Analysis, and Mini Review of Potential Mechanisms of Action
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Neurology, January 2015
|
DOI | 10.3389/fneur.2014.00274 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Dongying Xu, Ping Huang, Zhaosheng Yu, Daniel H. Xing, Shuai Ouyang, Guoqiang Xing |
Abstract |
Intracranial/intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) is a leading cause of death and disability in people with traumatic brain injury (TBI) and stroke. No proven drug is available for ICH. Panax notoginseng (total saponin extraction, PNS) is one of the most valuable herb medicines for stroke and cerebralvascular disorders in China. We searched for randomized controlled clinical trials (RCTs) involving PNS injection to treat cerebral hemorrhage for meta-analysis from various databases including the Chinese Stroke Trials Register, the trials register of the Cochrane Complementary Medicine Field, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE, Chinese BioMedical disk, and China Doctorate/Master Dissertations Databases. The quality of the eligible trials was assessed by Jadad's scale. Twenty (20) of the 24 identified randomized controlled trials matched the inclusive criteria including 984 ICH patients with PNS injection and 907 ICH patients with current treatment (CT). Compared to the CT groups, PNS-treated patients showed better outcomes in the effectiveness rate (ER), neurological deficit score, intracranial hematoma volume, intracerebral edema volume, Barthel index, the number of patients died, and incidence of adverse events. |
X Demographics
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 25% |
Unknown | 3 | 75% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 50% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 25% |
Scientists | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 90 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 12% |
Student > Master | 10 | 11% |
Other | 9 | 10% |
Student > Bachelor | 7 | 8% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 8% |
Other | 19 | 21% |
Unknown | 27 | 30% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 23 | 26% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 10 | 11% |
Psychology | 7 | 8% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 4% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 4% |
Other | 14 | 16% |
Unknown | 28 | 31% |