↓ Skip to main content

Staphylococcus aureus biofilms: recent developments in biofilm dispersal

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology, December 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
patent
2 patents

Readers on

mendeley
1119 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Staphylococcus aureus biofilms: recent developments in biofilm dispersal
Published in
Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology, December 2014
DOI 10.3389/fcimb.2014.00178
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jessica L. Lister, Alexander R. Horswill

Abstract

Staphylococcus aureus is a major cause of nosocomial and community-acquired infections and represents a significant burden on the healthcare system. S. aureus attachment to medical implants and host tissue, and the establishment of a mature biofilm, play an important role in the persistence of chronic infections. The formation of a biofilm, and encasement of cells in a polymer-based matrix, decreases the susceptibility to antimicrobials and immune defenses, making these infections difficult to eradicate. During infection, dispersal of cells from the biofilm can result in spread to secondary sites and worsening of the infection. In this review, we discuss the current understanding of the pathways behind biofilm dispersal in S. aureus, with a focus on enzymatic and newly described broad-spectrum dispersal mechanisms. Additionally, we explore potential applications of dispersal in the treatment of biofilm-mediated infections.

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,119 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 <1%
Denmark 2 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Unknown 1110 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 175 16%
Student > Master 154 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 151 13%
Researcher 71 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 46 4%
Other 118 11%
Unknown 404 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 180 16%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 142 13%
Immunology and Microbiology 133 12%
Medicine and Dentistry 74 7%
Chemistry 30 3%
Other 117 10%
Unknown 443 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 May 2021.
All research outputs
#4,100,760
of 22,778,347 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
#806
of 6,354 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#58,061
of 352,842 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
#7
of 44 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,778,347 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,354 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 352,842 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 44 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.