Yue Liu, Dao-Feng Zhang, Xiujuan Zhou, Li Xu, Lida Zhang, Xianming Shi
Abstract
Salmonella is one of the primary causes of foodborne disease, especially Salmonella enterica subsp. enterica (I) which has caused ~99% of clinical salmonellosis cases for humans and domestic mammals. The flagella genes, fliC and fljB, which encode the Salmonella phase 1 and phase 2 antigens respectively, are considered as the Salmonella serotype determinant genes, and contribute to the virulence of Salmonella. However, the evolution of the two flagellin genes is still not well-understood. In this study, the fliC and fljB gene clusters were analyzed among 205 S. enterica subspecies I genomes. The dataset covered 87 different serovars of S. enterica subsp. enterica and included 9 genomes (six serovars) of four other Salmonella subspecies. Based on a pan-genome definition and flanked gene linkages, the fliC and fljB gene clusters were identified in 207 (91 serovars) and 138 (61 serovars) genomes, respectively. A phylogenetic tree constructed based on SNPs (Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms) of core genes were used to reflect the essential evolutionary relationships among various serovars. Congruence analysis was performed among the core genome and each gene of fliC and fljB gene clusters, with only fliA and fliS showing congruence to Salmonella core genome. Congruence was also observed among fliB, fliC/fljB, and fliD genes, and their phylogeny revealed a division into two major groups, which strongly corresponded to monophasic and biphasic serovars. Besides, homologous recombination events referring fliB, fliC, and fliD were found to have mainly occurred within each group. These results suggested two distinct evolutionary patterns of Salmonella flagellin gene clusters. Further insight on the evolutionary implication of the two patterns and a framework for phase variation mechanism are needed to be further processed.
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 January 2018.
All research outputs
#14,370,803
of 23,012,811 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Microbiology
#12,553
of 25,119 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#239,217
of 440,933 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Microbiology
#316
of 516 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,012,811 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 25,119 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 440,933 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 516 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
