The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 63 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Association between basal stem rot disease and simple sequence repeat markers in oil palm, Elaeis guineensis Jacq.
|
---|---|
Published in |
Euphytica, October 2014
|
DOI | 10.1007/s10681-014-1270-6 |
Authors |
Emad Omer Hama-Ali, Jothi Malar Panandam, Soon Guan Tan, Sharifah Shahrul Rabiah Syed Alwee, Tan Joon Sheong, Ho Chai Ling, Parameswari Namasivayam, Hoh Boon Peng |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Indonesia | 1 | 2% |
United States | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 61 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 15 | 24% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 11% |
Student > Master | 7 | 11% |
Student > Bachelor | 6 | 10% |
Unspecified | 5 | 8% |
Other | 13 | 21% |
Unknown | 10 | 16% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 36 | 57% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 8 | 13% |
Unspecified | 5 | 8% |
Arts and Humanities | 1 | 2% |
Psychology | 1 | 2% |
Other | 4 | 6% |
Unknown | 8 | 13% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 September 2017.
All research outputs
#7,543,662
of 23,015,156 outputs
Outputs from Euphytica
#327
of 1,139 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#83,626
of 255,939 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Euphytica
#2
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,015,156 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,139 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 255,939 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 7 of them.