Paolo Bazzigaluppi, Sheena C. Isenia, Elize D. Haasdijk, Ype Elgersma, Chris I. De Zeeuw, Ruben S. van der Giessen, Marcel T. G. de Jeu
Abstract
The inferior olive (IO) is a nucleus located in the brainstem and it is part of the olivo-cerebellar loop. This circuit plays a fundamental role in generation and acquisition of coherent motor patterns and it relies on synchronous activation of groups of Purkinje cells (PC) in the cerebellar cortex. IO neurons integrate their intrinsic oscillatory activity with excitatory inputs coming from the somatosensory system and inhibitory feedback coming from the cerebellar nuclei. Alongside these chemical synaptic inputs, IO neurons are coupled to one another via connexin 36 (Cx36) containing gap junctions (GJs) that create a functional syncytium between neurons. Communication between olivary neurons is regulated by these GJs and their correct functioning contributes to coherent oscillations in the IO and proper motor learning. Here, we explore the cellular pathways that can regulate the coupling between olivary neurons. We combined in vitro electrophysiology and immunohistochemistry (IHC) on mouse acute brain slices to unravel the pathways that regulate olivary coupling. We found that enhancing the activity of the protein kinase A (PKA) pathway and blocking the Ca2+/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II (CaMKII) pathway can both down-regulate the size of the coupled network. However, these two kinases follow different mechanisms of action. Our results suggest that activation of the PKA pathway reduces the opening probability of the Cx36 GJs, whereas inhibition of the CaMKII pathway reduces the number of Cx36 GJs. The low densities of Cx36 proteins and electrical synapses in βCaMKII knock-out mice point towards an essential role for this protein kinase in regulating the density of GJs in the IO. Thus, the level of olivary coupling is a dynamic process and regulated by a variety of enzymes modulating GJs expression, docking and activity.
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science
1
3%
Physics and Astronomy
1
3%
Other
1
3%
Unknown
9
29%
Attention Score in Context
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 December 2017.
All research outputs
#20,458,307
of 23,015,156 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience
#3,587
of 4,263 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#374,724
of 439,314 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience
#84
of 105 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,015,156 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,263 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 439,314 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 105 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
