↓ Skip to main content

Comprehensive miRNA sequence analysis reveals survival differences in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma patients

Overview of attention for article published in Genome Biology, January 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
26 X users
patent
2 patents
facebook
2 Facebook pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
98 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
126 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Comprehensive miRNA sequence analysis reveals survival differences in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma patients
Published in
Genome Biology, January 2015
DOI 10.1186/s13059-014-0568-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Emilia L Lim, Diane L Trinh, David W Scott, Andy Chu, Martin Krzywinski, Yongjun Zhao, A Gordon Robertson, Andrew J Mungall, Jacqueline Schein, Merrill Boyle, Anja Mottok, Daisuke Ennishi, Nathalie A Johnson, Christian Steidl, Joseph M Connors, Ryan D Morin, Randy D Gascoyne, Marco A Marra

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 26 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 126 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Denmark 2 2%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Haiti 1 <1%
Unknown 119 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 29 23%
Researcher 22 17%
Student > Bachelor 11 9%
Student > Master 10 8%
Student > Postgraduate 9 7%
Other 27 21%
Unknown 18 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 30 24%
Medicine and Dentistry 29 23%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 27 21%
Computer Science 6 5%
Immunology and Microbiology 4 3%
Other 10 8%
Unknown 20 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 May 2019.
All research outputs
#2,061,307
of 26,542,140 outputs
Outputs from Genome Biology
#1,690
of 4,631 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,165
of 365,544 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genome Biology
#33
of 65 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,542,140 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,631 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 365,544 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 65 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.