The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Did Popper solve Hume's problem?
|
---|---|
Published in |
Nature, November 1993
|
DOI | 10.1038/366105a0 |
Authors |
Allan Goddard Lindh |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Chile | 1 | 4% |
Unknown | 23 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 3 | 13% |
Other | 2 | 8% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 8% |
Researcher | 2 | 8% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 8% |
Other | 1 | 4% |
Unknown | 12 | 50% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 13% |
Neuroscience | 2 | 8% |
Social Sciences | 2 | 8% |
Environmental Science | 2 | 8% |
Philosophy | 1 | 4% |
Other | 2 | 8% |
Unknown | 12 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 January 2019.
All research outputs
#7,451,284
of 22,780,165 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#65,326
of 90,835 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,136
of 21,535 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#114
of 187 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,780,165 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 90,835 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 99.3. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 21,535 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 187 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.