↓ Skip to main content

Lactate Effectively Covers Energy Demands during Neuronal Network Activity in Neonatal Hippocampal Slices

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Neuroenergetics, January 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
53 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
92 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Lactate Effectively Covers Energy Demands during Neuronal Network Activity in Neonatal Hippocampal Slices
Published in
Frontiers in Neuroenergetics, January 2011
DOI 10.3389/fnene.2011.00002
Pubmed ID
Authors

Anton Ivanov, Marat Mukhtarov, Piotr Bregestovski, Yuri Zilberter

Abstract

Although numerous experimental data indicate that lactate is efficiently used for energy by the mature brain, the direct measurements of energy metabolism parameters during neuronal network activity in early postnatal development have not been performed. Therefore, the role of lactate in the energy metabolism of neurons at this age remains unclear. In this study, we monitored field potentials and contents of oxygen and NAD(P)H in correlation with oxidative metabolism during intense network activity in the CA1 hippocampal region of neonatal brain slices. We show that in the presence of glucose, lactate is effectively utilized as an energy substrate, causing an augmentation of oxidative metabolism. Moreover, in the absence of glucose lactate is fully capable of maintaining synaptic function. Therefore, during network activity in neonatal slices, lactate can be an efficient energy substrate capable of sustaining and enhancing aerobic energy metabolism.

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 92 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 4%
Portugal 1 1%
Germany 1 1%
Finland 1 1%
Netherlands 1 1%
Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of 1 1%
Japan 1 1%
Unknown 82 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 22%
Researcher 13 14%
Student > Master 13 14%
Professor 10 11%
Student > Bachelor 9 10%
Other 14 15%
Unknown 13 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 29 32%
Neuroscience 19 21%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 10%
Psychology 2 2%
Other 7 8%
Unknown 16 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 April 2023.
All research outputs
#7,207,328
of 22,782,096 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neuroenergetics
#16
of 39 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#52,930
of 180,642 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neuroenergetics
#2
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,782,096 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 39 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one scored the same or higher as 23 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 180,642 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.