The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
The Case for Diet: A Safe and Efficacious Strategy for Secondary Stroke Prevention
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Neurology, February 2015
|
DOI | 10.3389/fneur.2015.00001 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Jennifer L. Dearborn, Victor C. Urrutia, Walter N. Kernan |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 4 | 29% |
Switzerland | 4 | 29% |
Italy | 2 | 14% |
Unknown | 4 | 29% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 8 | 57% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 21% |
Scientists | 2 | 14% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 67 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 1% |
Germany | 1 | 1% |
Luxembourg | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 64 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 11 | 16% |
Researcher | 8 | 12% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 10% |
Student > Bachelor | 6 | 9% |
Other | 6 | 9% |
Other | 12 | 18% |
Unknown | 17 | 25% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 12 | 18% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 10 | 15% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 7% |
Neuroscience | 4 | 6% |
Computer Science | 3 | 4% |
Other | 12 | 18% |
Unknown | 21 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 October 2016.
All research outputs
#2,873,866
of 22,783,848 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neurology
#1,848
of 11,667 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#43,339
of 351,943 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neurology
#23
of 81 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,783,848 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,667 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 351,943 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 81 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.