The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 85 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Improved oral bioavailability of poorly water-soluble indirubin by a supersaturatable self-microemulsifying drug delivery system
|
---|---|
Published in |
International Journal of Nanomedicine, February 2012
|
DOI | 10.2147/ijn.s28761 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Zhi-Qiang Chen, Ying Liu, Ji-Hui Zhao, Lan Wang, Nian-Ping Feng |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
India | 2 | 2% |
Iran, Islamic Republic of | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 82 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 17 | 20% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 13% |
Researcher | 8 | 9% |
Student > Postgraduate | 6 | 7% |
Student > Bachelor | 4 | 5% |
Other | 14 | 16% |
Unknown | 25 | 29% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 17 | 20% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 13 | 15% |
Chemistry | 6 | 7% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 7% |
Engineering | 3 | 4% |
Other | 8 | 9% |
Unknown | 32 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 January 2022.
All research outputs
#5,446,629
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Nanomedicine
#524
of 4,123 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#44,458
of 253,530 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Nanomedicine
#14
of 93 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,123 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 253,530 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 93 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.