↓ Skip to main content

Correlations between Risk Factors for Breast Cancer and Genetic Instability in Cancer Patients—A Clinical Perspective Study

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Genetics, February 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
49 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Correlations between Risk Factors for Breast Cancer and Genetic Instability in Cancer Patients—A Clinical Perspective Study
Published in
Frontiers in Genetics, February 2018
DOI 10.3389/fgene.2017.00236
Pubmed ID
Authors

Márcia Fernanda Correia Jardim Paz, Marcus Vinícius Oliveira Barros de Alencar, Antonio Luiz Gomes, Keylla da Conceição Machado, Muhammad Torequl Islam, Eunus S. Ali, Manik Chandra Shill, Iqbal Ahmed, Jamal Uddin, Ana Maria Oliveira Ferreira da Mata, Ricardo Melo de Carvalho, Kátia da Conceição Machado, André Luiz Pinho Sobral, Felipe Cavalcanti Carneiro da Silva, João Marcelo de Castro e Souza, Daniel Dias Rufino Arcanjo, Paulo Michel Pinheiro Ferreira, Siddhartha Kumar Mishra, Juliana da Silva, Ana Amélia de Carvalho Melo-Cavalcante

Abstract

Molecular epidemiological studies have identified several risk factors linking to the genes and external factors in the pathogenesis of breast cancer. In this sense, genetic instability caused by DNA damage and DNA repair inefficiencies are important molecular events for the diagnosis and prognosis of therapies. Therefore, the objective of this study was to analyze correlation between sociocultural, occupational, and lifestyle risk factors with levels of genetic instability in non-neoplastic cells of breast cancer patients. Total 150 individuals were included in the study that included 50 breast cancer patients submitted to chemotherapy (QT), 50 breast cancer patients submitted to radiotherapy (RT), and 50 healthy women without any cancer. Cytogenetic biomarkers for apoptosis and DNA damage were evaluated in samples of buccal epithelial and peripheral blood cells through micronuclei and comet assay tests. Elder age patients (61-80 years) had higher levels of apoptosis (catriolysis by karyolysis) and DNA damage at the diagnosis (baseline damage) with increased cell damage during QT and especially during RT. We also reported the increased frequencies of cytogenetic biomarkers in patients who were exposed to ionizing radiation as well as for alcoholism and smoking. QT and RT induced high levels of fragmentation (karyorrhexis) and nuclear dissolution (karyolysis) and DNA damage. Correlations were observed between age and karyorrhexis at diagnosis; smoking and karyolysis during RT; and radiation and karyolysis during QT. These correlations indicate that risk factors may also influence the genetic instability in non-neoplastic cells caused to the patients during cancer therapies.

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 49 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 49 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 16%
Student > Bachelor 6 12%
Student > Master 5 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 4%
Other 9 18%
Unknown 16 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 12 24%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 2%
Environmental Science 1 2%
Other 5 10%
Unknown 19 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 April 2019.
All research outputs
#14,376,243
of 23,023,224 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Genetics
#3,996
of 12,073 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#192,600
of 336,877 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Genetics
#63
of 112 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,023,224 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,073 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 336,877 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 112 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.