↓ Skip to main content

Cyclic-di-GMP and oprF Are Involved in the Response of Pseudomonas aeruginosa to Substrate Material Stiffness during Attachment on Polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS)

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Microbiology, February 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
82 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Cyclic-di-GMP and oprF Are Involved in the Response of Pseudomonas aeruginosa to Substrate Material Stiffness during Attachment on Polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS)
Published in
Frontiers in Microbiology, February 2018
DOI 10.3389/fmicb.2018.00110
Pubmed ID
Authors

Fangchao Song, Hao Wang, Karin Sauer, Dacheng Ren

Abstract

Recently, we reported that the stiffness of poly(dimethylsiloxane) (PDMS) affects the attachment ofPseudomonas aeruginosa, and the morphology and antibiotic susceptibility of attached cells. To further understand howP. aeruginosaresponses to material stiffness during attachment, the wild-typeP. aeruginosaPAO1 and several isogenic mutants were characterized for their attachment on soft and stiff PDMS. Compared to the wild-type strain, mutation of theoprFgene abolished the differences in attachment, growth, and size of attached cells between soft and stiff PDMS surfaces. These defects were rescued by genetic complementation ofoprF. We also found that the wild-typeP. aeruginosaPAO1 cells attached on soft (40:1) PDMS have higher level of intracellular cyclic dimeric guanosine monophosphate (c-di-GMP), a key regulator of biofilm formation, compared to those on stiff (5:1) PDMS surfaces. Consistently, the mutants offleQandwspF, which have similar high-level c-di-GMP as theoprFmutant, exhibited defects in response to PDMS stiffness during attachment. Collectively, the results from this study suggest thatP. aeruginosacan sense the stiffness of substrate material during attachment and respond to such mechanical cues by adjusting c-di-GMP level and thus the following biofilm formation. Further understanding of the related genes and pathways will provide new insights into bacterial mechanosensing and help develop better antifouling materials.

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 82 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 82 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 21%
Student > Bachelor 9 11%
Student > Master 8 10%
Researcher 7 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 4%
Other 11 13%
Unknown 27 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 16 20%
Immunology and Microbiology 8 10%
Chemistry 7 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 5%
Chemical Engineering 4 5%
Other 15 18%
Unknown 28 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 February 2018.
All research outputs
#15,492,327
of 23,023,224 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Microbiology
#15,370
of 25,143 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#269,551
of 440,124 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Microbiology
#363
of 539 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,023,224 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 25,143 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 440,124 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 539 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.