The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
The Mendocino Crustal Conveyor: Making and Breaking the California Crust
|
---|---|
Published in |
International Geology Review, July 2010
|
DOI | 10.2747/0020-6814.45.9.767 |
Authors |
Kevin P. Furlong, Jane Lock, Chris Guzofski, Jaime Whitlock, Harley Benz |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 24 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 25% |
Student > Master | 4 | 17% |
Student > Bachelor | 3 | 13% |
Researcher | 3 | 13% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 8% |
Other | 3 | 13% |
Unknown | 3 | 13% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 16 | 67% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 8% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 4% |
Engineering | 1 | 4% |
Unknown | 4 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 November 2016.
All research outputs
#7,453,479
of 22,786,691 outputs
Outputs from International Geology Review
#44
of 261 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,812
of 94,857 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Geology Review
#11
of 93 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,786,691 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 261 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 94,857 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 93 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.