The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Increased Vigilance Needed for the Detection of Thrombotic Complications of Central Venous Access in Adolescent Cystic Fibrosis Patients
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Pediatrics, January 2014
|
DOI | 10.3389/fped.2014.00117 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Nandini Kandamany, Basil Elnazir, Peter Greally |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 7 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 2 | 29% |
Other | 1 | 14% |
Student > Master | 1 | 14% |
Researcher | 1 | 14% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 1 | 14% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 1 | 14% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 57% |
Sports and Recreations | 1 | 14% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 14% |
Unknown | 1 | 14% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 November 2018.
All research outputs
#13,065,845
of 23,025,074 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Pediatrics
#1,575
of 6,096 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#158,501
of 306,685 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Pediatrics
#5
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,025,074 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,096 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 306,685 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.