↓ Skip to main content

Mixed Electrical–Chemical Synapses in Adult Rat Hippocampus are Primarily Glutamatergic and Coupled by Connexin-36

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Neuroanatomy, January 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (65th percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
42 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
80 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Mixed Electrical–Chemical Synapses in Adult Rat Hippocampus are Primarily Glutamatergic and Coupled by Connexin-36
Published in
Frontiers in Neuroanatomy, January 2012
DOI 10.3389/fnana.2012.00013
Pubmed ID
Authors

Farid Hamzei-Sichani, Kimberly G. V. Davidson, Thomas Yasumura, William G. M. Janssen, Susan L. Wearne, Patrick R. Hof, Roger D. Traub, Rafael Gutiérrez, Ole P. Ottersen, John E. Rash

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 80 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Mexico 1 1%
Chile 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Germany 1 1%
Unknown 76 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 18%
Researcher 12 15%
Student > Bachelor 11 14%
Student > Master 9 11%
Professor 8 10%
Other 17 21%
Unknown 9 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 30 38%
Neuroscience 24 30%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 1%
Other 6 8%
Unknown 9 11%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 January 2020.
All research outputs
#7,547,176
of 23,025,074 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neuroanatomy
#477
of 1,167 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#71,344
of 245,484 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neuroanatomy
#9
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,025,074 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,167 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 245,484 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.