↓ Skip to main content

QseC Mediates Osmotic Stress Resistance and Biofilm Formation in Haemophilus parasuis

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Microbiology, February 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
34 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
28 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
QseC Mediates Osmotic Stress Resistance and Biofilm Formation in Haemophilus parasuis
Published in
Frontiers in Microbiology, February 2018
DOI 10.3389/fmicb.2018.00212
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lvqin He, Ke Dai, Xintian Wen, Lingqiang Ding, Sanjie Cao, Xiaobo Huang, Rui Wu, Qin Zhao, Yong Huang, Qigui Yan, Xiaoping Ma, Xinfeng Han, Yiping Wen

Abstract

Haemophilus parasuis is known as a commensal organism discovered in the upper respiratory tract of swine where the pathogenic bacteria survive in various adverse environmental stress. QseC, a histidine protein kinase of the two-component regulatory systems CheY/QseC, is involved in the environmental adaptation in bacteria. To investigate the role of QseC in coping with the adverse environment stresses and survive in the host, we constructed aqseCmutant ofH. parasuisserovar 13 strain (ΔqseC), MY1902. In this study, we found that QseC was involved in stress tolerance ofH. parasuis, by the ΔqseCexhibited a decreased resistance to osmotic pressure, oxidative stress, and heat shock. Moreover, the ΔqseCweakened the ability to take up iron and biofilm formation. We also found that the QseC participate in sensing the epinephrine in environment to regulate the density ofH. parasuis.

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 28 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 21%
Student > Master 6 21%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 11%
Researcher 2 7%
Student > Bachelor 1 4%
Other 2 7%
Unknown 8 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Immunology and Microbiology 5 18%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 11%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 3 11%
Psychology 1 4%
Other 4 14%
Unknown 8 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 June 2023.
All research outputs
#3,061,683
of 23,920,246 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Microbiology
#2,777
of 26,612 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#72,710
of 451,366 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Microbiology
#84
of 554 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,920,246 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 26,612 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 451,366 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 554 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.