The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Antitumor Agents. V. Synthesis and Antileukemic Activity of E-Ring-Modified (RS)-Camptothecin Analogues
|
---|---|
Published in |
Chemical and Pharmaceutical Bulletin, January 1992
|
DOI | 10.1248/cpb.40.683 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
A Ejima, H Terasawa, M Sugimori, S Ohsuki, K Matsumoto, Y Kawato, M Yasuoka, H Tagawa |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 3 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 2 | 67% |
Student > Master | 1 | 33% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 67% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 October 2008.
All research outputs
#3,314,613
of 23,026,672 outputs
Outputs from Chemical and Pharmaceutical Bulletin
#143
of 5,717 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,451
of 62,023 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Chemical and Pharmaceutical Bulletin
#5
of 191 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,026,672 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,717 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 62,023 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 191 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.