↓ Skip to main content

OsVIL2 Regulates Spikelet Development by Controlling Regulatory Genes in Oryza sativa

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Plant Science, February 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
20 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
OsVIL2 Regulates Spikelet Development by Controlling Regulatory Genes in Oryza sativa
Published in
Frontiers in Plant Science, February 2018
DOI 10.3389/fpls.2018.00102
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hyeryung Yoon, Jungil Yang, Wanqi Liang, Dabing Zhang, Gynheung An

Abstract

Flower organ patterning is accomplished by spatial and temporal functioning of various regulatory genes. We previously reported thatOryza sativa VIN3-LIKE 2(OsVIL2) induces flowering by mediating the trimethylation of Histone H3 onLFL1chromatin. In this study, we report thatOsVIL2also plays crucial roles during spikelet development. Two independent lines of T-DNA insertional mutants in the gene displayed altered organ numbers and abnormal morphology in all spikelet organs. Scanning electron microscopy showed thatosvil2affected organ primordia formation during early spikelet development. Expression analysis revealed thatOsVIL2is expressed in all stages of the spikelet developmental. Transcriptome analysis of developing spikelets revealed that several regulatory genes involved in that process and the formation of floral organs were down-regulated inosvil2. These results suggest thatOsVIL2 is required for proper expression of the regulatory genes that control floral organ number and morphology.

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 20 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 20%
Researcher 3 15%
Professor 3 15%
Student > Postgraduate 2 10%
Other 1 5%
Other 2 10%
Unknown 5 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 55%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 15%
Design 1 5%
Unknown 5 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 March 2018.
All research outputs
#20,468,008
of 23,026,672 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Plant Science
#16,443
of 20,560 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#375,405
of 437,335 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Plant Science
#385
of 439 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,026,672 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 20,560 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 437,335 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 439 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.