↓ Skip to main content

Idiopathic Mast Cell Activation Syndrome With Associated Salicylate Intolerance

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Pediatrics, March 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (69th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
11 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Readers on

mendeley
9 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Idiopathic Mast Cell Activation Syndrome With Associated Salicylate Intolerance
Published in
Frontiers in Pediatrics, March 2018
DOI 10.3389/fped.2018.00073
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tobias Rechenauer, Martin Raithel, Thomas Götze, Gregor Siebenlist, Aline Rückel, Hanns-Wolf Baenkler, Arndt Hartmann, Florian Haller, André Hoerning

Abstract

Idiopathic mast cell activation syndrome can be a rare cause for chronic abdominal pain in children. It remains a diagnosis by exclusion that can be particularly challenging due to the vast variety of possible clinical manifestations. We present a 13-year-old boy who suffered from a multitude of unspecific complaints over a long period of time. In this case, an assessment of mast cell-derived metabolites and immunohistochemical analysis of bioptic specimen was worthwhile. After ruling out, primary (oncologic) and secondary causes for mast cell activation, pharmacologic treatment adapted to the patient's salicylate intolerance resulted in a major relief of symptoms.

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 9 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 2 22%
Researcher 2 22%
Other 1 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 11%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 11%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 2 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Business, Management and Accounting 2 22%
Chemical Engineering 1 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 11%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 11%
Other 2 22%
Unknown 1 11%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 November 2023.
All research outputs
#5,491,748
of 26,576,308 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Pediatrics
#972
of 8,135 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#94,912
of 348,773 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Pediatrics
#35
of 115 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,576,308 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,135 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 348,773 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 115 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.