The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Antiplatelet agents for preventing thrombosis after peripheral arterial bypass surgery
|
---|---|
Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2015
|
DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd000535.pub3 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Rachel B Forster, Anne Lethaby, Heather Maxwell, Stefan Acosta, Martin H Prins |
Abstract |
Peripheral arterial disease (PAD) may cause occlusions (blockages) in the main arteries of lower limbs. One treatment option is bypass surgery using autologous (the patient's own tissue) vein graft or prosthetic (artificial) graft. A number of factors influence occlusion rates in these patients, including the material used. To prevent graft occlusion patients are usually treated with antiplatelet, antithrombotic drugs, or a combination of both. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 2 | 50% |
Unknown | 2 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 3 | 75% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 203 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 3 | 1% |
Canada | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 199 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 33 | 16% |
Researcher | 30 | 15% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 8% |
Student > Bachelor | 15 | 7% |
Student > Postgraduate | 14 | 7% |
Other | 48 | 24% |
Unknown | 46 | 23% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 99 | 49% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 14 | 7% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 3% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 5 | 2% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 2% |
Other | 20 | 10% |
Unknown | 55 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 October 2021.
All research outputs
#6,745,329
of 26,150,873 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,243
of 13,188 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#69,108
of 270,534 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#180
of 286 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,150,873 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,188 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.7. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 270,534 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 286 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.