↓ Skip to main content

Elevated romantic love and jealousy if relationship status is declared on Facebook

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Psychology, February 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
34 news outlets
blogs
3 blogs
twitter
24 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
34 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
80 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Elevated romantic love and jealousy if relationship status is declared on Facebook
Published in
Frontiers in Psychology, February 2015
DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00214
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gábor Orosz, Ádám Szekeres, Zoltán G. Kiss, Péter Farkas, Christine Roland-Lévy

Abstract

Declared relationship status on Facebook can serve as a public commitment and as an extra layer of a couple's security. However, the question arises: do those who report the relationship status feel stronger romantic love and jealousy toward their partners than those who do not share such information publicly? To test this assumption, profile information and questionnaire data of romantic love and jealousy were gathered from 292, 230 females) respondents that were in a relationship. Our results suggest that announcing the relationship status is associated with elevated romantic love and jealousy. Therefore, being "Facebook official" can be interpreted as a tie-sign indicating that the couple is "out of the market," and can promote their unity as a "digital wedding ring."

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 24 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 80 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Hungary 1 1%
Unknown 79 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 17 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 13%
Researcher 9 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 8%
Student > Postgraduate 4 5%
Other 12 15%
Unknown 22 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 33 41%
Social Sciences 6 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 4%
Computer Science 3 4%
Arts and Humanities 2 3%
Other 8 10%
Unknown 25 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 304. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 February 2024.
All research outputs
#119,948
of 26,404,318 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#241
of 35,330 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,192
of 270,415 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#9
of 435 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,404,318 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 35,330 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 270,415 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 435 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.