The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Effectiveness of intermediate care in nursing‐led in‐patient units
|
---|---|
Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2007
|
DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd002214.pub3 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Peter D Griffiths, Margaret E Edwards, Angus Forbes, Ruth G Harris, Gill Ritchie |
Abstract |
The Nursing led inpatient Unit (NLU) is one of a range of services that have been considered in order to manage more successfully the transition between hospital and home for patients with extended recovery times. This is an update of an earlier review published in The Cochrane Library in Issue 3, 2004. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 25% |
Unknown | 3 | 75% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 50% |
Scientists | 1 | 25% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 223 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | <1% |
Canada | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 221 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 31 | 14% |
Student > Bachelor | 29 | 13% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 23 | 10% |
Researcher | 22 | 10% |
Other | 15 | 7% |
Other | 37 | 17% |
Unknown | 66 | 30% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Nursing and Health Professions | 48 | 22% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 47 | 21% |
Social Sciences | 15 | 7% |
Psychology | 13 | 6% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 5 | 2% |
Other | 22 | 10% |
Unknown | 73 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 June 2020.
All research outputs
#4,709,754
of 25,931,626 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,969
of 13,164 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,002
of 88,731 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#28
of 63 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,931,626 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,164 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.2. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 88,731 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 63 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.