↓ Skip to main content

A Systematic Review of 10 Years of Augmented Reality Usability Studies: 2005 to 2014

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Robotics and AI, April 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#25 of 1,867)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
212 X users
googleplus
1 Google+ user
reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
328 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
679 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A Systematic Review of 10 Years of Augmented Reality Usability Studies: 2005 to 2014
Published in
Frontiers in Robotics and AI, April 2018
DOI 10.3389/frobt.2018.00037
Pubmed ID
Authors

Arindam Dey, Mark Billinghurst, Robert W. Lindeman, J. Edward Swan

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 212 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 679 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 679 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 126 19%
Student > Master 92 14%
Student > Bachelor 58 9%
Researcher 56 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 30 4%
Other 107 16%
Unknown 210 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 174 26%
Engineering 67 10%
Social Sciences 33 5%
Design 26 4%
Psychology 25 4%
Other 112 16%
Unknown 242 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 162. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 March 2021.
All research outputs
#273,452
of 26,793,597 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Robotics and AI
#25
of 1,867 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,876
of 344,570 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Robotics and AI
#1
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,793,597 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,867 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 344,570 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.