↓ Skip to main content

Living without insulin: the role of leptin signaling in the hypothalamus

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Neuroscience, March 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
21 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Readers on

mendeley
56 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Living without insulin: the role of leptin signaling in the hypothalamus
Published in
Frontiers in Neuroscience, March 2015
DOI 10.3389/fnins.2015.00108
Pubmed ID
Authors

Teppei Fujikawa, Roberto Coppari

Abstract

Since its discovery in 1922, insulin has been thought to be required for normal metabolic homeostasis and survival. However, this view would need to be revised as recent results from different laboratories have convincingly indicated that life without insulin is possible in rodent models. These data indicate that particular neuronal circuitries, which include hypothalamic leptin-responsive neurons, are empowered with the capability of permitting life in complete absence of insulin. Here, we review the neuronal and peripheral mechanisms by which leptin signaling in the central nervous system (CNS) regulates glucose metabolism in an insulin-independent manner.

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 21 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 56 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 2 4%
United States 2 4%
United Kingdom 1 2%
Ireland 1 2%
Spain 1 2%
Denmark 1 2%
Unknown 48 86%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 21%
Researcher 9 16%
Student > Bachelor 8 14%
Professor 5 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 7%
Other 11 20%
Unknown 7 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14 25%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 16%
Neuroscience 7 13%
Psychology 2 4%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 13 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 May 2019.
All research outputs
#2,746,681
of 26,369,011 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#1,711
of 11,831 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,203
of 278,808 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#22
of 135 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,369,011 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,831 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 278,808 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 135 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.