The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Varying importance of cuticular hydrocarbons and iridoids in the species-specific mate recognition pheromones of three closely related Leptopilina species
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution, March 2015
|
DOI | 10.3389/fevo.2015.00019 |
Authors |
Ingmar Weiss, John Hofferberth, Joachim Ruther, Johannes Stökl |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 44 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Japan | 1 | 2% |
Italy | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 42 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 20% |
Student > Master | 8 | 18% |
Researcher | 7 | 16% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 7% |
Student > Bachelor | 2 | 5% |
Other | 5 | 11% |
Unknown | 10 | 23% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 21 | 48% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 9% |
Environmental Science | 2 | 5% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 2% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 2% |
Other | 5 | 11% |
Unknown | 10 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 February 2017.
All research outputs
#1,839,805
of 22,794,367 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
#649
of 4,072 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,457
of 262,013 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
#10
of 39 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,794,367 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,072 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 262,013 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 39 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.