The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 421 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Habitat fragmentation and its lasting impact on Earth’s ecosystems
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Science Advances, March 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1126/sciadv.1500052 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Nick M. Haddad, Lars A. Brudvig, Jean Clobert, Kendi F. Davies, Andrew Gonzalez, Robert D. Holt, Thomas E. Lovejoy, Joseph O. Sexton, Mike P. Austin, Cathy D. Collins, William M. Cook, Ellen I. Damschen, Robert M. Ewers, Bryan L. Foster, Clinton N. Jenkins, Andrew J. King, William F. Laurance, Douglas J. Levey, Chris R. Margules, Brett A. Melbourne, A. O. Nicholls, John L. Orrock, Dan-Xia Song, John R. Townshend |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 52 | 12% |
| United Kingdom | 30 | 7% |
| Australia | 17 | 4% |
| Canada | 9 | 2% |
| Madagascar | 6 | 1% |
| Sweden | 6 | 1% |
| Colombia | 5 | 1% |
| Germany | 4 | <1% |
| Mexico | 3 | <1% |
| Other | 33 | 8% |
| Unknown | 256 | 61% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 305 | 72% |
| Scientists | 97 | 23% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 16 | 4% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | <1% |
| Unknown | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5,294 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 24 | <1% |
| United States | 23 | <1% |
| Germany | 8 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 7 | <1% |
| Mexico | 6 | <1% |
| Argentina | 6 | <1% |
| Portugal | 5 | <1% |
| Canada | 5 | <1% |
| France | 5 | <1% |
| Other | 33 | <1% |
| Unknown | 5172 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 922 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 804 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 770 | 15% |
| Researcher | 587 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 244 | 5% |
| Other | 672 | 13% |
| Unknown | 1295 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1748 | 33% |
| Environmental Science | 1331 | 25% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 174 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 153 | 3% |
| Engineering | 76 | 1% |
| Other | 322 | 6% |
| Unknown | 1490 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1091. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 September 2024.
All research outputs
#14,985
of 26,560,265 outputs
Outputs from Science Advances
#215
of 13,318 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#112
of 278,296 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science Advances
#4
of 49 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,560,265 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,318 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 118.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 278,296 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 49 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.