↓ Skip to main content

A comparative study of Whi5 and retinoblastoma proteins: from sequence and structure analysis to intracellular networks

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Physiology, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
50 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A comparative study of Whi5 and retinoblastoma proteins: from sequence and structure analysis to intracellular networks
Published in
Frontiers in Physiology, January 2014
DOI 10.3389/fphys.2013.00315
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mehedi Hasan, Stefania Brocca, Elena Sacco, Michela Spinelli, Elena Papaleo, Matteo Lambrughi, Lilia Alberghina, Marco Vanoni

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 50 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 50 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 34%
Researcher 5 10%
Student > Master 5 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 8%
Student > Bachelor 4 8%
Other 10 20%
Unknown 5 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 20 40%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14 28%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 4%
Chemical Engineering 1 2%
Other 3 6%
Unknown 7 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 April 2018.
All research outputs
#15,505,836
of 23,043,346 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Physiology
#6,760
of 13,785 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#191,634
of 306,688 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Physiology
#63
of 106 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,043,346 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,785 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 306,688 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 106 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.