@drl4567 @OlinoTom Reminds me of this paper that argued QRP should really stand for questionable reporting practices https://t.co/wyQ2Gqjw33
@LauraMKoenig @EHPS_OS_SIG @FORRTproject I'm assigning this article lately - the switch to framing QRPs as questionable *reporting* practices sets it a little more solidly in the RCR domain and highlights the fact that anyone can engage in the practices -
Others have proposed that Questionable Reporting Practices is a better label. It’s the incomplete reporting that is the primary issue, not the practice itself. I like this framing a lot (but didn’t stumble on it until after the paper) https://t.co/A1pGJWpW
@BenediktEhinger @cognikobusch Radboud president Daniel Wigboldus has actually written a paper on "questionnable research practices" rather being "questionnable reporting practices": https://t.co/2OKGZJMVwV (But yeah as @cognikobusch I'm not really convinc