The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Functional diversity of primate bitter taste receptors
|
---|---|
Published in |
Hikaku seiri seikagaku(Comparative Physiology and Biochemistry), January 2015
|
DOI | 10.3330/hikakuseiriseika.32.24 |
Authors |
Kei TSUTSUI, Hiroo IMAI |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 6 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 2 | 33% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 17% |
Unknown | 3 | 50% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 33% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 17% |
Unknown | 3 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 April 2015.
All research outputs
#6,238,273
of 24,357,902 outputs
Outputs from Hikaku seiri seikagaku(Comparative Physiology and Biochemistry)
#1
of 1 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#79,756
of 361,864 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Hikaku seiri seikagaku(Comparative Physiology and Biochemistry)
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,357,902 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 0.0. This one scored the same or higher as 0 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 361,864 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them