The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Placenta Prévia: Fatores de risco para o Acretismo
|
---|---|
Published in |
Revista Brasileira de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia, August 2001
|
DOI | 10.1590/s0100-72032001000700002 |
Authors |
Maria Regina Torloni, Antonio Fernandes Moron, Luiz Camano |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 21 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 7 | 33% |
Student > Master | 3 | 14% |
Other | 1 | 5% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 5% |
Professor | 1 | 5% |
Other | 2 | 10% |
Unknown | 6 | 29% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 11 | 52% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 5% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 5% |
Engineering | 1 | 5% |
Unknown | 7 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 March 2017.
All research outputs
#8,008,826
of 25,988,468 outputs
Outputs from Revista Brasileira de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia
#4
of 4 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,468
of 40,765 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Revista Brasileira de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,988,468 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.2. This one scored the same or higher as 0 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 40,765 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them