Title |
The Effect of Hydrostatic Pressure on Enrichments of Hydrocarbon Degrading Microbes From the Gulf of Mexico Following the Deepwater Horizon Oil Spill
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Microbiology, April 2018
|
DOI | 10.3389/fmicb.2018.00808 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Angeliki Marietou, Roger Chastain, Felix Beulig, Alberto Scoma, Terry C. Hazen, Douglas H. Bartlett |
Abstract |
The Deepwater Horizon oil spill was one of the largest and deepest oil spills recorded. The wellhead was located at approximately 1500 m below the sea where low temperature and high pressure are key environmental characteristics. Using cells collected 4 months following the Deepwater Horizon oil spill at the Gulf of Mexico, we set up Macondo crude oil enrichments at wellhead temperature and different pressures to determine the effect of increasing depth/pressure to the in situ microbial community and their ability to degrade oil. We observed oil degradation under all pressure conditions tested [0.1, 15, and 30 megapascals (MPa)], although oil degradation profiles, cell numbers, and hydrocarbon degradation gene abundances indicated greatest activity at atmospheric pressure. Under all incubations the growth of psychrophilic bacteria was promoted. Bacteria closely related to Oleispira antarctica RB-8 dominated the communities at all pressures. At 30 MPa we observed a shift toward Photobacterium, a genus that includes piezophiles. Alphaproteobacterial members of the Sulfitobacter, previously associated with oil-degradation, were also highly abundant at 0.1 MPa. Our results suggest that pressure acts synergistically with low temperature to slow microbial growth and thus oil degradation in deep-sea environments. |
X Demographics
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Australia | 1 | 17% |
United States | 1 | 17% |
Israel | 1 | 17% |
Unknown | 3 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Scientists | 4 | 67% |
Members of the public | 2 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 81 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 17% |
Student > Bachelor | 10 | 12% |
Researcher | 9 | 11% |
Student > Master | 7 | 9% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 4% |
Other | 5 | 6% |
Unknown | 33 | 41% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Environmental Science | 12 | 15% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 11 | 14% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 10 | 12% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 3 | 4% |
Chemical Engineering | 2 | 2% |
Other | 5 | 6% |
Unknown | 38 | 47% |