The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
A framework to classify error in animal-borne technologies
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution, May 2015
|
DOI | 10.3389/fevo.2015.00055 |
Authors |
Zackory T. Burns, E. Emiel van Loon |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Canada | 1 | 7% |
Unknown | 14 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 27% |
Student > Master | 2 | 13% |
Researcher | 2 | 13% |
Other | 1 | 7% |
Student > Bachelor | 1 | 7% |
Other | 3 | 20% |
Unknown | 2 | 13% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 53% |
Environmental Science | 4 | 27% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 7% |
Unknown | 2 | 13% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 May 2015.
All research outputs
#21,313,393
of 26,174,669 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
#3,723
of 5,322 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#208,001
of 281,871 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
#33
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,174,669 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,322 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 281,871 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.