The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Recent developments in the management of dry age-related macular degeneration
|
---|---|
Published in |
Clinical Ophthalmology, April 2015
|
DOI | 10.2147/opth.s59724 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Elisa Buschini, Antonio M Fea, Carlo A Lavia, Marco Nassisi, Giulia Pignata, Marta Zola, Federico M Grignolo |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Canada | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 140 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 140 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 26 | 19% |
Student > Bachelor | 18 | 13% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 12% |
Student > Master | 15 | 11% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 12 | 9% |
Other | 19 | 14% |
Unknown | 33 | 24% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 41 | 29% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 14 | 10% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 11 | 8% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 9 | 6% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 8 | 6% |
Other | 17 | 12% |
Unknown | 40 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 July 2015.
All research outputs
#20,958,095
of 26,629,686 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Ophthalmology
#2,524
of 3,861 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#197,583
of 279,940 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Ophthalmology
#22
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,629,686 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,861 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 279,940 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.