↓ Skip to main content

Crosstalk of the Insulin-Like Growth Factor Receptor with the Wnt Signaling Pathway in Breast Cancer

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in endocrinology, June 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
44 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Crosstalk of the Insulin-Like Growth Factor Receptor with the Wnt Signaling Pathway in Breast Cancer
Published in
Frontiers in endocrinology, June 2015
DOI 10.3389/fendo.2015.00092
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lauren M. Rota, Teresa L. Wood

Abstract

The insulin-like growth factor system has long been considered a pathway that promotes cell proliferation, survival, and transformation, and is thus a promoter of tumorigenesis. However, recent failure of clinical trials for IGF-1R inhibitors reveals the need for a better understanding of how this pathway functions in specific tumor subtypes. Ongoing studies are designed to uncover biomarkers and downstream targets to enhance therapeutic strategies. Other approaches in specific tumor models reveal complex interactions between IGF signaling and other tumor initiating pathways. Here, we review relevant background and recent studies suggesting that inhibiting the IGF-1R can amplify Wnt and Notch signaling pathways in a model of triple negative breast cancer.

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 44 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 2%
Italy 1 2%
Unknown 42 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 20%
Student > Bachelor 7 16%
Student > Master 7 16%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 11%
Researcher 5 11%
Other 5 11%
Unknown 6 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 19 43%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 23%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 18%
Linguistics 1 2%
Chemistry 1 2%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 5 11%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 July 2015.
All research outputs
#19,944,091
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in endocrinology
#5,754
of 13,009 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#191,901
of 280,054 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in endocrinology
#33
of 56 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,009 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 280,054 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 56 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.