The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 47 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Economic analysis of Acacia mearnsii De Wild production and charcoal in the Valley of Caí and Taquari, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
|
---|---|
Published in |
Ciência Rural, May 2015
|
DOI | 10.1590/0103-8478cr20140114 |
Authors |
Flávio Cunha Laureano da Silva, Jorge Antonio de Farias |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 47 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 2 | 4% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 1 | 2% |
Other | 1 | 2% |
Student > Postgraduate | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 42 | 89% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 6% |
Engineering | 2 | 4% |
Unknown | 42 | 89% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 May 2015.
All research outputs
#22,758,309
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Ciência Rural
#1,057
of 2,231 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#239,358
of 278,920 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ciência Rural
#8
of 44 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,231 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.3. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 278,920 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 44 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.