Title |
Young children's learning of relational categories: multiple comparisons and their cognitive constraints
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Psychology, May 2015
|
DOI | 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00643 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Jean-Pierre Thibaut, Arnaud Witt |
Abstract |
Relational categories are notoriously difficult to learn because they are not defined by intrinsic stable properties. We studied the impact of comparisons on relational concept learning with a novel word learning task in 42-month-old children. Capitalizing on Gentner et al. (2011), two, three or four pairs of stimuli were introduced with a novel relational word. In a given trial, the set of pairs was composed of either close or far pairs (e.g., close pair: knife1-watermelon, knife2-orange, knife3-slice of bread and knife4-meat; far pair: ax-evergreen tree, saw-log, cutter-cardboard, and knife-slice of bread, for the "cutter for" relation). Close pairs (2 vs. 3 vs. 4 pairs) led to random generalizations whereas comparisons with far pairs gave the expected relational generalization. The 3 pair case gave the best results. It is argued that far pairs promote deeper comparisons than close pairs. As shown by a control experiment, this was the case only when far pairs display well known associations. |
X Demographics
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Switzerland | 1 | 50% |
Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Scientists | 1 | 50% |
Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 2 | 5% |
Unknown | 38 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 28% |
Researcher | 5 | 13% |
Student > Bachelor | 4 | 10% |
Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 10% |
Student > Master | 3 | 8% |
Other | 6 | 15% |
Unknown | 7 | 18% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Psychology | 14 | 35% |
Linguistics | 4 | 10% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 8% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 5% |
Philosophy | 2 | 5% |
Other | 5 | 13% |
Unknown | 10 | 25% |