↓ Skip to main content

Structural Integration, an Alternative Method of Manual Therapy and Sensorimotor Education

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Alternative & Complementary Medicine, October 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
twitter
3 X users
facebook
4 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
q&a
1 Q&A thread

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
177 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Structural Integration, an Alternative Method of Manual Therapy and Sensorimotor Education
Published in
Journal of Alternative & Complementary Medicine, October 2011
DOI 10.1089/acm.2010.0258
Pubmed ID
Authors

Eric Jacobson

Abstract

The objectives of this report are to review the clinical practice of Structural Integration (SI), an alternative method of soft-tissue manipulation and sensorimotor education, and to summarize the evidence to date for mechanism and clinical efficacy.

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 177 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 1%
Spain 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 173 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 25 14%
Student > Bachelor 25 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 17 10%
Researcher 13 7%
Other 31 18%
Unknown 44 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 42 24%
Nursing and Health Professions 25 14%
Psychology 15 8%
Sports and Recreations 9 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 5%
Other 25 14%
Unknown 53 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 26. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 July 2024.
All research outputs
#1,553,093
of 26,327,128 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Alternative & Complementary Medicine
#421
of 2,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,906
of 151,501 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Alternative & Complementary Medicine
#7
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,327,128 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,499 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 151,501 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.