↓ Skip to main content

Intramolecular Fuzzy Interactions Involving Intrinsically Disordered Domains

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences, April 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (52nd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
70 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
79 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Intramolecular Fuzzy Interactions Involving Intrinsically Disordered Domains
Published in
Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences, April 2018
DOI 10.3389/fmolb.2018.00039
Pubmed ID
Authors

Miguel Arbesú, Guillermo Iruela, Héctor Fuentes, João M. C. Teixeira, Miquel Pons

Abstract

Structural disorder is an essential ingredient for function in many proteins and protein complexes. Fuzzy complexes describe the many instances where disorder is maintained as a critical element of protein interactions. In this minireview we discuss how intramolecular fuzzy interactions function in signaling complexes. Focussing on the Src family of kinases, we argue that the intrinsically disordered domains that are unique for each of the family members and display a clear fingerprint of long range interactions in Src, might have critical roles as functional sensor or effectors and mediate allosteric communication via fuzzy interactions.

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 79 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 79 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 22%
Researcher 11 14%
Student > Master 9 11%
Student > Bachelor 8 10%
Professor 6 8%
Other 8 10%
Unknown 20 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 36 46%
Chemistry 10 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 6%
Philosophy 1 1%
Chemical Engineering 1 1%
Other 2 3%
Unknown 24 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 May 2018.
All research outputs
#13,072,573
of 23,577,654 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences
#812
of 4,108 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#153,266
of 326,671 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences
#13
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,654 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,108 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 326,671 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.