The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 40 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Faulting associated with the olivine to spinel transformation in Mg2GeO4 and its implications for deep‐focus earthquakes
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Geophysical Research, September 2012
|
DOI | 10.1029/90jb01937 |
Authors |
Pamela C. Burnley, Harry W. Green, David J. Prior |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 40 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 25% |
Researcher | 9 | 23% |
Professor | 6 | 15% |
Student > Bachelor | 3 | 8% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 5% |
Other | 3 | 8% |
Unknown | 7 | 18% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 28 | 70% |
Materials Science | 1 | 3% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 3% |
Engineering | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 9 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 May 2018.
All research outputs
#6,597,135
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Geophysical Research
#3,336
of 12,946 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#48,034
of 188,905 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Geophysical Research
#946
of 4,350 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,946 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 188,905 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,350 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.