↓ Skip to main content

Advances in imaging ultrastructure yield new insights into presynaptic biology

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience, May 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (68th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (64th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
82 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Advances in imaging ultrastructure yield new insights into presynaptic biology
Published in
Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience, May 2015
DOI 10.3389/fncel.2015.00196
Pubmed ID
Authors

Joseph J. Bruckner, Hong Zhan, Kate M. O’Connor-Giles

Abstract

Synapses are the fundamental functional units of neural circuits, and their dysregulation has been implicated in diverse neurological disorders. At presynaptic terminals, neurotransmitter-filled synaptic vesicles are released in response to calcium influx through voltage-gated calcium channels activated by the arrival of an action potential. Decades of electrophysiological, biochemical, and genetic studies have contributed to a growing understanding of presynaptic biology. Imaging studies are yielding new insights into how synapses are organized to carry out their critical functions. The development of techniques for rapid immobilization and preservation of neuronal tissues for electron microscopy (EM) has led to a new renaissance in ultrastructural imaging that is rapidly advancing our understanding of synapse structure and function.

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 82 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
Germany 1 1%
Switzerland 1 1%
Unknown 78 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 27 33%
Researcher 18 22%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 9%
Student > Bachelor 6 7%
Student > Master 5 6%
Other 11 13%
Unknown 8 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 28 34%
Neuroscience 21 26%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 2%
Other 8 10%
Unknown 12 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 September 2019.
All research outputs
#7,927,518
of 25,452,734 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience
#1,468
of 4,712 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#88,126
of 281,784 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience
#42
of 116 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,452,734 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,712 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 281,784 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 116 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.